Twilight Tuesday and more!

MTV has come through with another Twilight Tuesday for us to read and ponder.  This one is about the potential for sequels.  We need to stress that as of today there is no contract for any of the sequels to be filmed.  We will let you know as soon as we hear anything official on that front.  A quote from the article states:

It’s been discussed,” producer Greg Mooradian revealed to MTV News recently. “I can’t tell you we’re at that place yet, but it’s definitely been discussed.”

The question at the end that Larry asks us to respond to is:

Would you like to see the sequels filmed at the same time, or would you rather have everyone take a few years off to catch their breath in-between movies?

EDITED:  They also have a great article on Carlisle, Peter Facinelli, and his Mercedes.

Go make your thoughts known and remember to tell them you heard about it from the Lexicon!

We also have an article from an Australian source about the environment while shooting the Twilight film with one of the funniest headlines I’ve seen in a long time!  Go check it out!

Comments

  1. alex says:

    Shooting them back to back? thats cool..but if they were merged….no…
    And I loved the carlisle video!!

  2. VampGirl says:

    PLEASE DON’T MERGE THE MOVIES JUST SHOOT THEM BACK TO BACK CUZ IN MY OPINION ROB IS ALREADY WAAAAAY TO OLD TO BE THE BEST POSSIBLE ‘HUMAN’ EDWARD AND HE’S ONLY GONNA GET OLDER AND SO WILL THE REST OF THE CAST.

  3. rebecca says:

    does australia know that they’re using a fake movie poster?

  4. immero says:

    i would die if there werent any sequels
    even if the movie was badd

  5. Maxxxine says:

    I think they should shoot them simultaneously because of the point brought up before of well…..vampires don’t age so they need to get those movies out fast.

    not that im complaining.
    =]

  6. immero says:

    when they say film simultaneously do they mean they are going to merge the books into one movie becuase that would really suck
    and not all the scenes would be there

  7. Lizzie-Anne says:

    They should shoot the films back to back, but not merge them – that would be too complicated, and it would mean that we would loose out on the hype of a 3rd film being released separately!! Lol.
    And I think that the movie might be released in the UK on December 12th, but some websites don’t even tell you. =[
    Does anybody know for definite? (The UK release date I mean)

  8. jane says:

    I think they SHOULD shoot them back to back because like VampGirl said Rob is already getting older (and he’s hot but he doesn’t look 17) I think he’s like 21 already so I don’t think they can afford to wait long.
    Also it will take a while to film New Moon because Taylor (not being 18) won’t be able to work as long as the other actors and New Moon is basically ALL Jacob and Bella. And wouldn’t it be great to have a Twilight movie come out each year for 4 years!
    I DIDN’T EVEN REALIZE THEY WOULD MAKE A MOVIE OF BREAKING DAWN BUT IF THEY’RE MAKING THE OTHER 3 IT MAKES SENSE! YAY!
    Obviously the actors would be EXHAUSTED! kudos to them for working this hard already and EXTRA for if they sign on to do NM. Eclipse, and BD. simultaneously!

  9. Talya says:

    I think they should definitely start on the sequels right away!
    Not just because of the long breaks we would have to wait through, but also because the actors and actresses aren’t going to look the same forever. :(

    :)

  10. marissa says:

    That article rocked! The best quote was

    “If Meyer, Mooradian and crew can come to an agreement, and moviegoers turn out in record numbers, look for Twilighters to be over the (New?) moon with a marathon shoot.”

    “(New?) moon”, ha ha that made my day ;)

  11. BluthEmployee says:

    http://s3.tinypic.com/345y8t3.jpg

    http://i28.tinypic.com/2d98e1h.jpg

    http://community.livejournal.com/tw_secret/14986.html#cutid1

    Maybe you guys will read this, and hopefully take it to heart. I love you guys, but it’s true.

  12. Midnight_Sunshine says:

    It would be nice if they shot them back to back, but then would they save videos and interviews with the cast for all three years? It wouldn’t be fun if there was no news because the movies were all done. In the article about Carlisle’s car it says that Jasper drives Bella in Carlisle’s car. I thought they were in Emmett’s car. Were they talking about driving to the airport?

  13. i smile at silver volvos says:

    forget silver volvos! i want a mercedes!!
    (even thought im not old enough to drive and i would have to win the lottery to get one! ;) )

  14. Nadiya says:

    I think its better if the film at the same time first because they cant age and second so they wont lose their edge (but on the other hand they might get tired and do a worse job)

    (i want a Mercedes 2)

  15. BReel says:

    shoot them all at once because; as Stephenie said; her characters don’t age. For continuity this would be ideal. I hope the talks work out to achieve this. Also, while the actors are in character and “in the zone” they should follow through with the whole story. I think they shot the second 2 Star Wars films back to back (if anyone here is old enough to remember), and that worked out well..

  16. icky vicky says:

    “… but it has definetly been discussed.” EEEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  17. iCullen says:

    No gap :D I can’t even wait for 8 months for ONE movie…Let alone a couple of years for the rest! Argh, this gets better and better! GOD I LOVE TWILIGHT.

  18. melissa says:

    thanks to the two who answered my question.

    :]

    i was having an off day and
    that was a silly thing to think, looking back. :/

  19. ok i am toatly thriled caus i won a contest and i get to meet (ROBERT PATTISON) OMG

  20. HI

Leave a Comment

Connect with Facebook

*