<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Pattinson on The View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/</link>
	<description>A Twilight Saga Fansite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247346</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. Most of the girls on this site tend to be COMPLETE FRAKKIN IDIOTS anyway. They make me ashamed to be a woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. Most of the girls on this site tend to be COMPLETE FRAKKIN IDIOTS anyway. They make me ashamed to be a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247186</guid>
		<description>I agree poor Emilie de Ravin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree poor Emilie de Ravin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247088</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247088</guid>
		<description>Ummmm, love Rob, but POOR Emilie! They should have had seperate interviews if they were only going to ask Rob questions. She&#039;s a great actress, would have loved to hear more about her character. This was a reminder of why I hate The View.  Does anyone else agree? Sorry if anyone likes them.
That being said, Rob was pretty hilarious, given the circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmm, love Rob, but POOR Emilie! They should have had seperate interviews if they were only going to ask Rob questions. She&#8217;s a great actress, would have loved to hear more about her character. This was a reminder of why I hate The View.  Does anyone else agree? Sorry if anyone likes them.<br />
That being said, Rob was pretty hilarious, given the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247024</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247024</guid>
		<description>The View is such a lightweight show and it always reminds me of why I&#039;ll leave a room full of women and go talk with the group of men at a party.  Their questions are inane.  And Barbara Walters doesn&#039;t even know what Twilight is about!  (Fangs...puhlease!)  

And poor Rob!  He&#039;s going to have to go on defending his quirky sense of humor for dense people who obviously have none.  I suppose he&#039;s right. Just start giving boring stock interviews with the same answers, or just don&#039;t give any at all.  Someone is always waiting to get their &quot;feelings&quot; hurt!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The View is such a lightweight show and it always reminds me of why I&#8217;ll leave a room full of women and go talk with the group of men at a party.  Their questions are inane.  And Barbara Walters doesn&#8217;t even know what Twilight is about!  (Fangs&#8230;puhlease!)  </p>
<p>And poor Rob!  He&#8217;s going to have to go on defending his quirky sense of humor for dense people who obviously have none.  I suppose he&#8217;s right. Just start giving boring stock interviews with the same answers, or just don&#8217;t give any at all.  Someone is always waiting to get their &#8220;feelings&#8221; hurt!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julianne</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247018</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247018</guid>
		<description>I love Rob, so don&#039;t get me wrong, but I thought they were rude to Emilie.  Someone should have had the prescence of mind to direct the conversation to her periodically.

As far as Barbara is concerned, one of the producers during a break should have clued her in on the fang thing.  She made the comment something like three times.  I give the others credit for not correcting her as a sign of respect, but Barbara - if you&#039;re going to interview, please do a modicum of research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Rob, so don&#8217;t get me wrong, but I thought they were rude to Emilie.  Someone should have had the prescence of mind to direct the conversation to her periodically.</p>
<p>As far as Barbara is concerned, one of the producers during a break should have clued her in on the fang thing.  She made the comment something like three times.  I give the others credit for not correcting her as a sign of respect, but Barbara &#8211; if you&#8217;re going to interview, please do a modicum of research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247013</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247013</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s been been said, but could they have ignored Emilie any more? Geez, she is the star of the movie too. While I love Rob, if they wanted to only interview him, they should have just had him on. This happened with Kristen too when she was promoting &quot;Yellow Handkerchief.&quot; They completely ignored Eddie. The PR people for these movies should tell the interviewer ahead of time that they must give equal questions to both participants or to just book Rob or Kristen only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s been been said, but could they have ignored Emilie any more? Geez, she is the star of the movie too. While I love Rob, if they wanted to only interview him, they should have just had him on. This happened with Kristen too when she was promoting &#8220;Yellow Handkerchief.&#8221; They completely ignored Eddie. The PR people for these movies should tell the interviewer ahead of time that they must give equal questions to both participants or to just book Rob or Kristen only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreakinLoon</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247011</link>
		<dc:creator>FreakinLoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247011</guid>
		<description>Ugh. That was utterly painful to watch and just confirms what I&#039;ve known since they started that show a long time ago, it&#039;s crap. 

I have no idea why they let that woman (Walters) to continue working. She&#039;s never been able to ask a question without fawning on her interviewee. 

But glad to see one woman with some sense -- Sherri Shepard. Still won&#039;t make me watch even if Robert does another appearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. That was utterly painful to watch and just confirms what I&#8217;ve known since they started that show a long time ago, it&#8217;s crap. </p>
<p>I have no idea why they let that woman (Walters) to continue working. She&#8217;s never been able to ask a question without fawning on her interviewee. </p>
<p>But glad to see one woman with some sense &#8212; Sherri Shepard. Still won&#8217;t make me watch even if Robert does another appearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247009</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247009</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see these vids!  Can someone PLZ YouTube them???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see these vids!  Can someone PLZ YouTube them???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea S.</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247007</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247007</guid>
		<description>Wow they completely ignored Emilie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow they completely ignored Emilie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2dream</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2010/03/02/robert-pattinson-on-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-247001</link>
		<dc:creator>love2dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=14984#comment-247001</guid>
		<description>I sure wish that they would give more questions and attention to the co-stars.  We all love Twilight stars, but let&#039;s be fair to the talented actors/actresses they work with. Poor Emily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure wish that they would give more questions and attention to the co-stars.  We all love Twilight stars, but let&#8217;s be fair to the talented actors/actresses they work with. Poor Emily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using wincache
Database Caching using wincache
Object Caching 423/453 objects using wincache

Served from: www.twilightlexicon.com @ 2012-02-13 19:15:27 -->
