<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rachelle Lefevre To Attend Premiere?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/</link>
	<description>A Twilight Saga Fansite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalie's Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230912</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalie's Pain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230912</guid>
		<description>Matt, I am not being childish at all.  With the limited amount of information that I have about the situation, I have decided not to go and see Eclipse.  I will rent it though.  I know that the franchise is not all about Rachelle.  However, I think she was treated wrong and therefore I will not spend my earned money at the theater.  I am sure my  8 dollars will not have a huge impact on how much money the movie earns(which is ultimately what the studios care about).  Also, I don&#039;t think I am disrespecting the director or cast.  I&#039;ve not said one bad thing about them, and if I am not mistaking, they already got paid for playing their parts and for directing the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I am not being childish at all.  With the limited amount of information that I have about the situation, I have decided not to go and see Eclipse.  I will rent it though.  I know that the franchise is not all about Rachelle.  However, I think she was treated wrong and therefore I will not spend my earned money at the theater.  I am sure my  8 dollars will not have a huge impact on how much money the movie earns(which is ultimately what the studios care about).  Also, I don&#8217;t think I am disrespecting the director or cast.  I&#8217;ve not said one bad thing about them, and if I am not mistaking, they already got paid for playing their parts and for directing the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCH</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230850</link>
		<dc:creator>CCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230850</guid>
		<description>Me too! Summit made a really bad mistake... but they&#039;ll still get paid heaps for it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too! Summit made a really bad mistake&#8230; but they&#8217;ll still get paid heaps for it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230845</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230845</guid>
		<description>Furthermore, I love Rachelle, but I also love what Summit has done.  Therefore, I will not assume that I know the entire story.  There could have been some issues that Rachelle didn&#039;t acknowledge, so I will not make any assumptions.  We all have a limited amount of knowledge about the situation.  However, to say that you will not see Eclipse is simply laughable.  It disrespects the entire cast, as well a director who, by all accounts, poured much of his time into this third installment of the saga.  This franchise is not all about Rachelle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, I love Rachelle, but I also love what Summit has done.  Therefore, I will not assume that I know the entire story.  There could have been some issues that Rachelle didn&#8217;t acknowledge, so I will not make any assumptions.  We all have a limited amount of knowledge about the situation.  However, to say that you will not see Eclipse is simply laughable.  It disrespects the entire cast, as well a director who, by all accounts, poured much of his time into this third installment of the saga.  This franchise is not all about Rachelle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230842</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230842</guid>
		<description>Why won&#039;t you see Eclipse?  That is unfair to the director and the cast, despite your assumptions about Summit Entertainment.  Please, that sounds incredibly childish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why won&#8217;t you see Eclipse?  That is unfair to the director and the cast, despite your assumptions about Summit Entertainment.  Please, that sounds incredibly childish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalie's Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalie's Pain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230834</guid>
		<description>To be honest, Rachelle is a classic example of &quot;good guys finish last&quot;  She did what she needed to do and played by the rules.  She was very devoted to the franchise and in turned got kicked to the curve.  I will go and see New Moon.  However, I will not go and see Eclipse.  I will go and rent it at the dollar red box when it comes out.  I will do this out of principle.  I do hope that she goes to the New Moon premier since she is part of the cast.  Hopefully her schedule will allow her to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, Rachelle is a classic example of &#8220;good guys finish last&#8221;  She did what she needed to do and played by the rules.  She was very devoted to the franchise and in turned got kicked to the curve.  I will go and see New Moon.  However, I will not go and see Eclipse.  I will go and rent it at the dollar red box when it comes out.  I will do this out of principle.  I do hope that she goes to the New Moon premier since she is part of the cast.  Hopefully her schedule will allow her to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230809</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230809</guid>
		<description>If she wants to go, I hope she gets the chance. Rachelle has been nothing but classy and strong through this whole stupid mess, so I have no doubt she will see it through this one last event.

I agree with Pamela, I LOVE Rachelle and am very happy for the opportunities that have come her way post-Summitt, but it makes me sad to think of Eclipse without her. I was really looking forward to that. But they say everything happens for a reason, so I&#039;m sure there are even brighter things coming Rachelle&#039;s way.

I for one will be in the theatre happily handing over my money when Casino Jack and Barney&#039;s Version come out next year. Probably not for Eclipse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she wants to go, I hope she gets the chance. Rachelle has been nothing but classy and strong through this whole stupid mess, so I have no doubt she will see it through this one last event.</p>
<p>I agree with Pamela, I LOVE Rachelle and am very happy for the opportunities that have come her way post-Summitt, but it makes me sad to think of Eclipse without her. I was really looking forward to that. But they say everything happens for a reason, so I&#8217;m sure there are even brighter things coming Rachelle&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>I for one will be in the theatre happily handing over my money when Casino Jack and Barney&#8217;s Version come out next year. Probably not for Eclipse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230792</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230792</guid>
		<description>She is Victoria, its her part and she&#039;s playing her!  Go take credit for a job well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is Victoria, its her part and she&#8217;s playing her!  Go take credit for a job well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ele</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230777</link>
		<dc:creator>Ele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230777</guid>
		<description>Why wouldn&#039;t she attend?

She *is* still in New Moon, so it&#039;s only natural for Rachelle to attend the premiere?  Besides, she has been incredibly classy, even after the situation with Summit.  She would not disappoint the fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t she attend?</p>
<p>She *is* still in New Moon, so it&#8217;s only natural for Rachelle to attend the premiere?  Besides, she has been incredibly classy, even after the situation with Summit.  She would not disappoint the fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230773</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230773</guid>
		<description>I agree with ALMOST everyone here (with Spazzy being the only exception) -- why wouldn&#039;t she go? She&#039;s got every right to be there because she is still Victoria in New Moon. Also, she&#039;s a classy lady. She wouldn&#039;t not show up just because Summit cheated her. She has always believed in the movie &amp; worked very hard to bring Victoria to life. In a prior interview she said that while reading the books, she most identified with Victoria even before she got the part so I truly feel that was her part from the beginning. 

I agree with Safina also. I get sad every time there&#039;s talk about Rachelle. I mean I do look forward to hearing what she&#039;s been doing but it makes me long for her to be in Eclipse. Look how many movies all the other actors have made, and I don&#039;t know when they were all made but why was Rachelle the only one who caught flack for it? I know it&#039;s a moot point but it still upsets me so. 

We love you Rachelle! Can&#039;t wait to watch you in New Moon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with ALMOST everyone here (with Spazzy being the only exception) &#8212; why wouldn&#8217;t she go? She&#8217;s got every right to be there because she is still Victoria in New Moon. Also, she&#8217;s a classy lady. She wouldn&#8217;t not show up just because Summit cheated her. She has always believed in the movie &amp; worked very hard to bring Victoria to life. In a prior interview she said that while reading the books, she most identified with Victoria even before she got the part so I truly feel that was her part from the beginning. </p>
<p>I agree with Safina also. I get sad every time there&#8217;s talk about Rachelle. I mean I do look forward to hearing what she&#8217;s been doing but it makes me long for her to be in Eclipse. Look how many movies all the other actors have made, and I don&#8217;t know when they were all made but why was Rachelle the only one who caught flack for it? I know it&#8217;s a moot point but it still upsets me so. </p>
<p>We love you Rachelle! Can&#8217;t wait to watch you in New Moon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: safina</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/11/01/rachelle-lefevre-to-attend-premiere/comment-page-1/#comment-230740</link>
		<dc:creator>safina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=11912#comment-230740</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Rachelle&#039;s right to go. She did such an amazing job in Twilight and New Moon. I wish I could attend the premiere too.
I feel so bad whenever there&#039;s a discussion on Rachelle. I still wish she could return somehow.
Love you Rachelle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Rachelle&#8217;s right to go. She did such an amazing job in Twilight and New Moon. I wish I could attend the premiere too.<br />
I feel so bad whenever there&#8217;s a discussion on Rachelle. I still wish she could return somehow.<br />
Love you Rachelle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using wincache
Database Caching 4/17 queries in 0.010 seconds using wincache
Object Caching 421/431 objects using wincache

Served from: www.twilightlexicon.com @ 2012-02-14 06:30:04 -->
