<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twilight Saga News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/</link>
	<description>A Twilight Saga Fansite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115757</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115757</guid>
		<description>I loved Sarah Jaffe&#039;s article! I&#039;m a college lit instructor and a Twilight fan, and no, there&#039;s no conflict of interest. For so long, literary heroines have either misbehaved and died (Wuthering Heights, Clarissa) or behaved themselves and happily married (Jane Eyre, Pamela). How refreshing that we can now find books in which the heroine is the one who wants sex, has concerns about marriage, and in the end gets her way. Yes, she also sacrifices herself for others&#039; happiness at times. Talk to any working mother and see whether that&#039;s a foreign feminine concept? People who criticize the Twilight series as &quot;unhealthy&quot; are also treating its readers as children, unable to make our own choices or differentiate between fantasy and reality. Let&#039;s not take that silently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Sarah Jaffe&#8217;s article! I&#8217;m a college lit instructor and a Twilight fan, and no, there&#8217;s no conflict of interest. For so long, literary heroines have either misbehaved and died (Wuthering Heights, Clarissa) or behaved themselves and happily married (Jane Eyre, Pamela). How refreshing that we can now find books in which the heroine is the one who wants sex, has concerns about marriage, and in the end gets her way. Yes, she also sacrifices herself for others&#8217; happiness at times. Talk to any working mother and see whether that&#8217;s a foreign feminine concept? People who criticize the Twilight series as &#8220;unhealthy&#8221; are also treating its readers as children, unable to make our own choices or differentiate between fantasy and reality. Let&#8217;s not take that silently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vle</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115746</link>
		<dc:creator>vle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115746</guid>
		<description>oh i loved the article ALOT!
and i know EXACTLY what the writer means!!!!

the day after Twilight came out this girl in class was saying 

     &quot;oh have you seen Twilight&quot;?
     &quot;well i havent seen it but my cousin saw it and he said it was HORRIBLE&quot;...

then she goes on to say all this CRAP!
oh he said the acting was HORRIBLE
he said the stunts were BAD 

(it was a low budget film was it not? plus i dont think they were that bad, i liked them)

and all the while im thinking how can a person be so ignorant and critize when they have NO CLUE WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT??????

i mean i guess she was just letting her cousin&#039;s opinions get to her or something (like the article said) 


oh well people are people and if they choose to waste their time getting all mad about how everyone loves twilight then why not let them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh i loved the article ALOT!<br />
and i know EXACTLY what the writer means!!!!</p>
<p>the day after Twilight came out this girl in class was saying </p>
<p>     &#8220;oh have you seen Twilight&#8221;?<br />
     &#8220;well i havent seen it but my cousin saw it and he said it was HORRIBLE&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>then she goes on to say all this CRAP!<br />
oh he said the acting was HORRIBLE<br />
he said the stunts were BAD </p>
<p>(it was a low budget film was it not? plus i dont think they were that bad, i liked them)</p>
<p>and all the while im thinking how can a person be so ignorant and critize when they have NO CLUE WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT??????</p>
<p>i mean i guess she was just letting her cousin&#8217;s opinions get to her or something (like the article said) </p>
<p>oh well people are people and if they choose to waste their time getting all mad about how everyone loves twilight then why not let them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115676</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115676</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased that The Host is doing so well. In my opinion The Host was better than Twilight, and I wasn&#039;t sure if it was going to do well when it first came out. I knew that some people would read it just because SM wrote it, but I didn&#039;t know if after that it would still do well. I am still absolutely in love with Twilight, but I just love The Host more, and it truly makes me happy that it is doing so well. This way we know that SM is not limited to writing stories about Vampires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased that The Host is doing so well. In my opinion The Host was better than Twilight, and I wasn&#8217;t sure if it was going to do well when it first came out. I knew that some people would read it just because SM wrote it, but I didn&#8217;t know if after that it would still do well. I am still absolutely in love with Twilight, but I just love The Host more, and it truly makes me happy that it is doing so well. This way we know that SM is not limited to writing stories about Vampires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwardbitespillow</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115634</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwardbitespillow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115634</guid>
		<description>i agree with you summer....whenever i read the Twilight series im in a happy world and i want to stay there...yes i know the story is fictional, but thats my escape place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with you summer&#8230;.whenever i read the Twilight series im in a happy world and i want to stay there&#8230;yes i know the story is fictional, but thats my escape place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazjade</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115617</link>
		<dc:creator>jazjade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115617</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to watch Stephanie&#039;s books continue to ride the top of the best-seller lists.  I am glad so many want to share Bella&#039;s story.  It&#039;s almost a cultural compulsion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to watch Stephanie&#8217;s books continue to ride the top of the best-seller lists.  I am glad so many want to share Bella&#8217;s story.  It&#8217;s almost a cultural compulsion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115604</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115604</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing I hate more than a bunch of bitter feminists blogging the Twilight-is-the-anti-Christ message... it&#039;s so old. Get over yourselves. No one made you read the books, so move on already.

And if nothing has been announced yet about the New Moon casting, that means there hasn&#039;t been any reliable information released.... we&#039;ll know soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing I hate more than a bunch of bitter feminists blogging the Twilight-is-the-anti-Christ message&#8230; it&#8217;s so old. Get over yourselves. No one made you read the books, so move on already.</p>
<p>And if nothing has been announced yet about the New Moon casting, that means there hasn&#8217;t been any reliable information released&#8230;. we&#8217;ll know soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrielle</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115601</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115601</guid>
		<description>Congrats to SM again. The twilight saga is still at the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to SM again. The twilight saga is still at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115600</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115600</guid>
		<description>Ok, this is weird. 

It means that, depending on one&#039;s perceptions, Twilight MAY or MAY NOT be feminist or sexist or whatever? Did that sum up everything? 

Because I don&#039;t understand any of these... 

To me, it&#039;s a series that can let me escape into. I truly enjoy the books. 

I do agree on what the person said though. Don&#039;t judge something when you didn&#039;t even read them in the 1st place. 
It&#039;s a case of sour grapes, I think. 

If you don&#039;t like it or think its ideas clashed with yours, then don&#039;t read it, but at the same time, don&#039;t judge or whine about it too. 

Had enough of all these self-proclaimed critics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, this is weird. </p>
<p>It means that, depending on one&#8217;s perceptions, Twilight MAY or MAY NOT be feminist or sexist or whatever? Did that sum up everything? </p>
<p>Because I don&#8217;t understand any of these&#8230; </p>
<p>To me, it&#8217;s a series that can let me escape into. I truly enjoy the books. </p>
<p>I do agree on what the person said though. Don&#8217;t judge something when you didn&#8217;t even read them in the 1st place.<br />
It&#8217;s a case of sour grapes, I think. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like it or think its ideas clashed with yours, then don&#8217;t read it, but at the same time, don&#8217;t judge or whine about it too. </p>
<p>Had enough of all these self-proclaimed critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Pederson</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115599</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Pederson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115599</guid>
		<description>I think the wiki article is full of crap. I like Ricky, but there&#039;s been NO news about casting. That&#039;s just a random rumor, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the wiki article is full of crap. I like Ricky, but there&#8217;s been NO news about casting. That&#8217;s just a random rumor, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwardbitespillow</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/01/04/twilight-saga-news-4/comment-page-1/#comment-115597</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwardbitespillow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlexicon.com/?p=3673#comment-115597</guid>
		<description>yea im with you Amy....can someone post anything about Taylor playing Jacob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea im with you Amy&#8230;.can someone post anything about Taylor playing Jacob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using wincache
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.009 seconds using wincache
Object Caching 420/424 objects using wincache

Served from: www.twilightlexicon.com @ 2012-02-13 22:26:48 -->
