Comments on: Twilight Tuesday

By: chrissy

chrissy — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:05:36 +0000

Who does Stephenie think she is? J.K. Rowling?

I honestly dont think Breaking Dawn will be made into a movie, and if it was it would look something like Blade.

By: pinky

pinky — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:06:24 +0000

I agree totally with #43 up there! I think the Hype will die down too much for 5 movies! Harry Potter has already died down and they arent even finished with the movies! Oh, and they even age in the book so its ok to drag them out!

By: Melissa

Melissa — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:39:44 +0000

My friend Savannah and I thought that Stephenie seemed negative in this clip..I personally believe that Breaking Dawn would make a fantastic movie. I loved how very visual the book was. I had a problem imagining the places in full, as I could in the other books but if I could see them on the screen it would most likely be amazing. Stephenie might not be much of a movie person but I think I speak for some in saying that we would love to see all of her books in the Twilight Saga including the beautiful Breaking Dawn turned into a feature film!

By: bumblebee33

bumblebee33 — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:45:23 +0000

Okay, so if BD was made into a movie, i think it should be one movie, but i think since it was so long, possibly too long to be one movie, they should take the wedding scene out and put it at the end of eclipse. i don’t really know if it would be too big a cliffhanger, but me and my friends both thought that since SO much happened in BD, SM should have put the wedding scene in eclipse.

By: twliunatic

twliunatic — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:54:41 +0000

i also agree with skye and eponine that james franco would make a great garett. hopefully he’ll audition.

By: Brianne

Brianne — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:00:26 +0000

I think I mentioned on an earlier posting that IMDBpro has New Moon listed as “In Development” for release in 2010. I agree that Breaking Dawn should be one movie though, unless they intend to add more of what happens with Alice after she leaves, then maybe two.

By: mrs.EDWARDCULLEN

mrs.EDWARDCULLEN — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:58:40 +0000

Personally, its a bit early for me to say anything. I think they should see how well Twilight does first. It COULD work as a standalone movie if it had to be.
Just thinking about New Moon and how boring that movie would be…
But if I had to choose … I dont really know. There are both pros and cons obviously. However, it seems like almost copying Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows since SM wants to split it into two movies.
That would be kind of good, more to look forward to. But the anticipation and waiting? I’m not really patient, unfortunetly.
I don’t know what BD would be rated if it were made into a movie … and if they put it all into one it would be rushed and crammed and stuff = not good. Doubt that everything would fit.
So yeah. I don’t really want them to do a BD movie. Not really. They could just put the wedding at the end of Eclipse. Then change BD a little if they were actually making a movie.
Wow, do you know how long this would take? It would be out in like … 2011 at the earliest!

By: skye

skye — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:19:58 +0000

I agree with Eponine. I like James Franco as Garrett. I can see it.

By: Devon061381

Devon061381 — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:52:23 +0000

I thought the interview with SM was fantastic and she answered more than I thought she did on the concert series tour.

At first, I thought BD would be a wreck of a movie. However, the birth scene would not be quite as visually detailed to keep it in the PG-13 range, so I’m sure it would be a lot of Jake and Ed shots. I thought 2 movies was a good idea first, but I agree with above posters about the fact that they could probably do it in one movie, with the inner dialogue cutting down the time substantially, and having it be longer than the others. Personally, I think we will get all of the sequels. Summit got a taste of the fan reaction to the movie when they showed up at Comi-Con. They’re already working on the script for New Moon, as confirmed from the producer. They’re going to wait to start filming until after the New Year, as long as Twilight gets a good reaction in the box office. They’ve also stated that they want to shoot the sequels back-to-back because they don’t want anyone to age significantly, and it’s more time and cost effective to reuse scenes/props rather than getting rid of them and then a year or so later start filming the next ones. It worked out well for LOTR by doing it that way. Then they can have a scheduled release timeline for each of the sequels. I feel pretty good about the fact that we’ll see sequels. I’m anxious to see how BD is handled as a script. I’m thinking there are going to be some “creative” changes, but nothing so dramatic that it would affect the storyline.

By: tw07

tw07 — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:50:50 +0000

I wonder how they would show Jacob’s imprinting. From an outsiders perspective he probably just looks like he’s gone a little crazy.